Global Invasive Species Database 100 of the worst Donations home
Standard Search Standard Search Taxonomic Search   Index Search

   Ctenopharyngodon idella (fish)  
Ecology Distribution Management
Info
Impact
Info
References
and Links
Contacts


    51 references found for Ctenopharyngodon idella:
    Management information
      Summary: The electronic tool kits made available on the Cefas page for free download are Crown Copyright (2007-2008). As such, these are freeware and may be freely distributed provided this notice is retained. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made and users should satisfy themselves as to the applicability of the results in any given circumstance. Toolkits available include 1) FISK- Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (English and Spanish language version); 2) MFISK- Marine Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit; 3) MI-ISK- Marine invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit; 4) FI-ISK- Freshwater Invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit and AmphISK- Amphibian Invasiveness Scoring Kit. These tool kits were developed by Cefas, with new VisualBasic and computational programming by Lorenzo Vilizzi, David Cooper, Andy South and Gordon H. Copp, based on VisualBasic code in the original Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) tool kit of P.C. Pheloung, P.A. Williams & S.R. Halloy (1999).
      The decision support tools are available from: http://cefas.defra.gov.uk/our-science/ecosystems-and-biodiversity/non-native-species/decision-support-tools.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2011]
      The guidance document is available from http://www.cefas.co.uk/media/118009/fisk_guide_v2.pdf [Accessed 13 January 2009].
      Summary: Available from: http://sbisrvntweb.uqac.ca/archivage/24061712.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/fishweb/2373.html [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.nobanis.org/files/Bern-fish%20identification.doc [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Ctenopharyngodon_idella [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    6. Frederieke J. Kroon, Peter C. Gehrke and Tagried Kurwie., 2005. Palatability of rotenone and antimycin baits for carp control. Ecological Management & Restoration. Vol 6 No 3 December 2005

    7. García-Berthou.; C Alcaraz, Q Pou-Rovira, L Zamora, G. Coenders, and C. Feo,., 2005. Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe et al. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Ottawa: Feb 2005. Vol. 62, Iss. 2; pg. 453, 11 pgs
      Summary: Available from: http://nis.gsmfc.org/nis_factsheet.php?toc_id=182 [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    9. Hill, Jeffrey E. and Paul Zajicek., 2007. National Aquatic Species Risk Analysis: A Call for Improved Implementation. Fisheries • Vol 32 no 11 • November 2007 • www.fisheries.org
      Summary: Available from: http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/CRC94/Ch10.pdf#page=18 [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: www.invasive.org/gist/moredocs/cteide02.rtf [Accessed January 31, 2010]

    12. Loch J.J, Bonar S.A., 1999. Occurrence of Grass Carp in the Lower Columbia and Snake Rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society: Vol. 128, No. 2 pp. 374–379
      Summary: Abstract only

    13. Marking, L.L, Bills T.D 1981. Sensitivity of Four Species of Carp to Selected Fish Toxicants. North American Journal of Fisheries Management: Vol. 1, No. 1 pp. 51–54
      Summary: Abstract only
      Summary: Available from: http://www.rsnz.org/publish/nzjmfr/1988/51.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: In 1993, Canada, Mexico and the United States signed the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) as a side agreement to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The NAAEC established the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) to help the Parties ensure that improved economic efficiency occurred simultaneously with trinational environmental cooperation. The NAAEC highlighted biodiversity as a key area for trinational cooperation. In 2001, the CEC adopted a resolution (Council Resolution 01-03), which created the Biodiversity Conservation Working Group (BCWG), a working group of high-level policy makers from Canada, Mexico and the United States. In 2003, the BCWG produced the “Strategic Plan for North American Cooperation in the Conservation of Biodiversity.” This strategy identified responding to threats, such as invasive species, as a priority action area. In 2004, the BCWG, recognizing the importance of prevention in addressing invasive species, agreed to work together to develop the draft CEC Risk Assessment Guidelines for Aquatic Alien Invasive Species (hereafter referred to as the Guidelines). These Guidelines will serve as a tool to North American resource managers who are evaluating whether or not to introduce a non-native species into a new ecosystem. Through this collaborative process, the BCWG has begun to implement its strategy as well as address an important trade and environment issue. With increased trade comes an increase in the potential for economic growth as well as biological invasion, by working to minimize the potential adverse impacts from trade, the CEC Parties are working to maximize the gains from trade while minimizing the environmental costs.
      Available from: English version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5516_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_en.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010]
      French version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5517_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_fr.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010]
      Spanish version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5518_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_es.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010].
      Summary: Available from: http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/fishing/threat.html [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Ctenopharyngodon+Idella+ [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    18. Pierce, A. Barry., 1983. Grass carp status in the United States: A review. Environmental Management Volume 7, Number 2 / March, 1983
      Summary: This is an informative review of grass carp and its history.

    19. Shelton W.L 1986. Strategies for Reducing Risks from Introductions of Aquatic Organisms: An Aquaculture Perspective. Fisheries: Vol. 11, No. 2 pp. 16–19
      Summary: Abstract only

    20. Simon, P. Thomas., 2007. Biodiversity of fishes in the Wabash River: status, indicators, and threats. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 115.2 (Feb 12, 2007): p136(13).

    21. Standish, Allen, K. Jr. and Robert J. Wattendorf., 1987. Triploid Grass Carp: Status and Management Implications. Fisheries, Vol. 12, 22 No. 4
      Summary: Available from: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs/cteide01.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    General references

    23. Bain, B. Mark., 1993. Assessing impacts of introduced aquatic species: Grass carp in large systems. Environmental Management Volume 17, Number 2 / March, 1993
      Summary: Available from: http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=kt8p30069f&doc.view=frames&chunk.id=d0e4819&toc.depth=1&toc.id=d0e4575&brand=calisphere [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: English:
      The species list sheet for the Mexican information system on invasive species currently provides information related to Scientific names, family, group and common names, as well as habitat, status of invasion in Mexico, pathways of introduction and links to other specialised websites. Some of the higher risk species already have a direct link to the alert page. It is important to notice that these lists are constantly being updated, please refer to the main page (http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Portada), under the section Novedades for information on updates.
      Invasive species - fish is available from: http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Especies_invasoras_-_Peces [Accessed 30 July 2008]
      Spanish:
      La lista de especies del Sistema de información sobre especies invasoras de méxico cuenta actualmente con información aceca de nombre científico, familia, grupo y nombre común, así como hábitat, estado de la invasión en México, rutas de introducción y ligas a otros sitios especializados. Algunas de las especies de mayor riesgo ya tienen una liga directa a la página de alertas. Es importante resaltar que estas listas se encuentran en constante proceso de actualización, por favor consulte la portada (http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Portada), en la sección novedades, para conocer los cambios.
      Especies invasoras - Peces is available from: http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Especies_invasoras_-_Peces [Accessed 30 July 2008]

    26. Contreras-MacBeath, Topiltzin ., Humberto Mejia Mojica and Roberto Carrillo Wilson., 1998. Negative impact on the aquatic ecosystems of the state of Morelos, Mexico from introduced aquarium and other commercial fish. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation. Volume 2, Number 2 / June, 1998

    27. Copp, G. H.; P. G. Bianco, N. G. Bogutskaya, T. Eros, I. Falka, M. T. Ferreira, M. G. Fox, J. Freyhof, R. E. Gozlan, J. Grabowska, V. Kovac, R. Moreno-Amich, A. M. Naseka, M. Penaz, M. Povz, M. Przybylski, M. Robillard, I. C. Russell, S. Stakenas, S. Sumer, A. Vila-Gispert and C. Wiesner., 2005. To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J. Appl. Ichthyol. 21 (2005), 242–262

    28. Economidis, P. S.; E. Dimitriou, R. Pagoni, E. Michaloudi, L. Natsis 2000. Introduced and translocated fish species in the inland waters of Greece Fisheries Management and Ecology 7 (3) , 239–250
      Summary: Abstract only
      Available from: http://www.sgnis.org/publicat/eldemurp.htm [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fishbase.org/comnames/CommonNamesList.php?ID=79&GenusName=Ctenopharyngodon&SpeciesName=idella&StockCode=88 [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fishbase.org/Country/CountryList.php?ID=79&GenusName=Ctenopharyngodon&SpeciesName=idella [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fishbase.org/trophiceco/EcosysList.cfm?ID=79&GenusName=Ctenopharyngodon&SpeciesName=idella [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fishbase.org/Reproduction/FishReproSummary.php?ID=79&GenusName=Ctenopharyngodon&SpeciesName=idella&fc=122&StockCode=88 [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=79&genusname=Ctenopharyngodon&speciesname=idella [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://data.gbif.org/species/13526121 [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    36. Goren, M.; B. S. Galil., 2005. A review of changes in the fish assemblages of Levantine inland and marine ecosystems following the introduction of non-native fishes. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21 (4) , 364–370
      Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
      Available from: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=163537 [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    38. Leonardos, I. D.; I. Kagalou, M. Tsoumani, P. S. Economidis 2008. Fish fauna in a Protected Greek lake: biodiversity, introduced fish species over a 80-year period and their impacts on the ecosystem

    39. McKnight, Keith S. & Gary R. Hepp ., 1995. Potential Effect of Grass Carp Herbivory on Waterfowl Foods. The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 59, No. 4. (Oct., 1995), pp. 720-727.
      Summary: Available from: http://www.rsnz.org/publish/nzjmfr/1986/24.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.niwa.cri.nz/rc/freshwater/fishatlas/species/grass_carp [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.asp?speciesID=514 [Accessed 4 March 2008]

    43. Pflieger, W.L., 1978. Distribution and Status of the Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) in Missouri Streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society: Vol. 107, No. 1 pp. 113–118
      Summary: Abstract only

    44. Povz, M; Sumer, S., 2005. A brief review of non-native freshwater fishes in Slovenia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Volume 21, Number 4, August 2005 , pp. 316-318(3)

    45. Povz, Meta., 1995. Status of freshwater fishes in the Adriatic catchment of Slovenia. Biological Conservation Volume 72, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 171-177

    46. Raibley, P.T., D. Blodgett, and R.E. Sparks, 1995. Evidence of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Reproduction in the Illinois and Upper Mississippi Rivers, Illinois Natural History Survey.
      Summary: Abstract only
      Summary: Available from: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v226/n5248/abs/226870a0.html [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.ncmr.gr/life-gizani/Article18.htm [Accessed 4 March 2008]
      Summary: Available from: http://www.ivb.cz/folia/52/4/337-358.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2008]

    50. Vooren, C. M. 1972. Ecological aspects of the introduction of fish species into natural habitats in Europe, with special reference to the Netherlands. A literature survey . Journal of Fish Biology 4 (4) , 565–583
      Summary: Available from: http://www.rsnz.org/publish/nzjmfr/2003/008.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2008]
          Results Page: 1  


ISSG Landcare Research NBII IUCN University of Auckland