33 references found for Cryphonectria parasitica:
Summary: Website the describes the history of the fungus in the United States and also goes in its biology and covers the impacts and current research related to this species.
Available from: http://www.ppws.vt.edu/griffin/blight.html [Accessed 15 September 2004]
2. Bragança, H., S. Simões, N. Onofre, R. Tenreiro and D. Rigling., 2007. Cryphonectria parasitica in Portugal: diversity of vegetative compatibility types, mating types, and occurrence of hypovirulence
pages Forest Pathology Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2007
391–402
Summary: Website the describes the history of the fungus in the United States and also goes in its biology and covers the impacts and current research related to this species.
Available from: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~chestnut/chestnut_blight.htm [Accessed 15 September 2004]
4. Dalavalle, E., and A. Zambonelli. 1999. Epidemiological role of strains of Cryphonectria parasitica isolated from hosts other than chestunut. European Journal of Forest Pathology 29: 97-102.
Summary: A scientific study that identifies species other than chestnuts which are affected by the fungus.
5. Davelos, A. L, and A. M. Jarosz. 2004. Demography of American chestnut populations: effects of a pathogen and a hyperparasite. Journal of Ecology 92:675-685.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
6. Diamandis, S & Perlerou, C., 2005. The role of Spulerina simploniella in the spread of chestnut blight Forest Pathology Volume 35 Issue 4 Page 315
Summary: Available from: http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/fungi/Cryphonectria_parasitica/ENDOPA_ds.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2008]
8. Frigimelica, G., Carpanelli, A., and Stergulc, F. 2001. Monitoring of widespread forest diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (North-eastern Italy). Journal of Forest Science (Prague). 47 (Special Issue 2): 81-84.
Summary: Monitoring of this species in north-eastern Italy.
9. Groome, P.C., Tattar, T.A., and Mount, M.S. 2001. Bacteria found on American chestnut bark and their potential in biocontrol of chestnut blight. Arboricultural Journal. 25 (3): 221-234.
Summary: Information on the chestnut blight in the USA and possible biological control options.
10. Guerin, L., G. Froidefond, and X.-M. Xu. 2001. Seasonal patterns of dispersal of ascospores of Cryphonectria parasitica (chestnut blight). Plant Pathology 50: 717-724.
Summary: Research paper covering the reproductive aspects of species.
11. Gurer, M., Ottaviani, M-P., and Cortesi, P. 2001. Genetic diversity of subpopulations of Cryphonectria parasitica in two chestnut-growing regions in Turkey. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 383-386.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Turkey.
12. Juhasova, G., and Bernadovicova, S. 2001. Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr and Phytophthora spp. in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Slovakia. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 373-377.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Slovakia.
Summary: PaDIL (Pests and Diseases Image Library) is a Commonwealth Government initiative, developed and built by Museum Victoria's Online Publishing Team, with support provided by DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry) and PHA (Plant Health Australia), a non-profit public company. Project partners also include Museum Victoria, the Western Australian Department of Agriculture and the Queensland University of Technology.
The aim of the project is: 1) Production of high quality images showing primarily exotic targeted organisms of plant health concern to Australia. 2) Assist with plant health diagnostics in all areas, from initial to high level. 3) Capacity building for diagnostics in plant health, including linkage developments between training and research organisations. 4) Create and use educational tools for training undergraduates/postgraduates. 5) Engender public awareness about plant health concerns in Australia.
PaDIL is available from : http://www.padil.gov.au/aboutOverview.aspx, this page is available from: http://www.padil.gov.au/viewPestDiagnosticImages.aspx?id=545 [Accessed 6 October 2006]
14. Liu, Y. C., D. L. Basso, B. I. Hillman, S. Kaneko, and M. G. Milgroom. 2003. Evidence for interspecies transmission of viruses in natural populations of filamentous fungi in the genus Cryphonectria. Molecular Ecology 12: 1619-1628.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
15. Liu, Y. C., M. L Double, W. L. MacDonald, and M. G. Milgroom. 2002. Persistence of Cryphonectria hypoviruses after their release for biological control of chestnut blight in West Virginia forests. Forest Pathology 32: 345-356
Summary: Scientific study using biological control methods on species.
16. Marra, R. E., and M. G. Milgroom. 1999. PCR amplification of the mating-type idiomorphs in Cryphonectria parasitica. Molecular Ecology 8: 1947-1950.
Summary: Scientific study using biological control methods on species.
17. Marra, R. E., and M. G. Milgroom. 2001. The mating system of the fungus Cryphonectria parasitica: selfing and self-incompatibility. Heredity 86(2): 134.
Summary: Research paper covering the reproductive aspects of species.
18. Radocz, L. 1998. Chestnut blight Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr and its biological control in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 33 (1-2): 131-145.
Summary: Biological control of chestnut blight in Hungary.
19. Radocz, L. 2001. Study of subpopulations of the chestnut blight (Cryphonectria parasitica) fungus in the Carpathian basin. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 368-372.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Hungary, Romania and the Ukraine.
20. Robin, C., and Heiniger, U. 2001. Chestnut blight in Europe: Diversity of Cryphonectria parasitica hypovirulence and biocontrol. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 361-367.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Europe.
21. Robin, C., Anziani, C., and Cortesi, P. 2000. Relationship between biological control, incidence of hypovirulence, and diversity of vegetative compatibility types of Cryphonectria parasitica in France. Phytopathology. 90 (7): 730-737.
Summary: Biological control of chestnut blight in France since 1974.
22. Seemann, D. 2001. Plant health and quarantine regulations of the European Union for Cryphonectria parasitica. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 402-404.
Summary: EU quarantine regulations for this species.
23. Vandermast, D. B., D. H. Van Lear, and B. D. Clinton. 2002. American chestnut as an allelopath in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 165: 173-181
Summary: Research paper that investigates some of the long term effects on forest composition in the United States that the fungus has caused.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
25. Diamond, S.J., Giles, R.H., Kirkpatrick, R.L., and Griffin, G.J. 2000. Hard mast production before and after the chestnut blight. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 24 (4): 196-201.
Summary: Changes in production of Southern Appalachian forests before and after the arrival of the chestnut blight fungus.
26. Gouveia, M.E., Cardoso, P., and Monteiro, M.d.L. 2001. Incidence of chestnut blight and diversity of vegetative compatible types of Cryphonectria parasitica in Tras-os-Montes (Portugal). Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 76 (3): 387-390.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Portugal
27. Haltofova, P., and Jankovsky, L. 2003. Distribution of sweet chestnut Castanea sativa Mill. in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science (Prague). 49 (6): 259-272.
Summary: First record of this species in the Czech Republic.
28. Hoegger, P.J., Rigling, D., Holdenrieder, O., and Heiniger, U. 2002. Cryphonectria radicalis: rediscovery of a lost fungus. Mycologia 94(1):105-115.
Summary: Description of C. radicalis
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
Available from: http://www.cbif.gc.ca/pls/itisca/taxastep?king=every&p_action=containing&taxa=Cryphonectria+parasitica&p_format=&p_ifx=plglt&p_lang= [Accessed December 31 2004]
30. Milgroom MG. 1995. Population biology of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Can. J. Bot. 73 (Suppl. 1): S311-S9
Summary: Biology anf genetics of C. parasitica populations.
31. Myburg, H., Gryzenhout, M., Wingfield, B.D., Stipes, R.J., and Wingfield, M.J. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of Cryphonectria and Endothia species, based on DNA sequence data and morphology. Mycologia 96(5): 990-1001.
Summary: Phylogeny of Cryphonectria and Endothia species.
32. Petkov, P., and Rossnev, B. 2000. Cryphonectria parasitica (Murril) bar of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Bulgaria. Nauka Za Gorata. 37 (4): 83-86.
Summary: Information on chestnut blight in Bulgaria.
33. Schmitz, D.C., and Simberloff, D. 1997. Biological Invasions: A growing threat. Issues in Science and Technology Online. Summer 1997.
Summary: Article about biological invasions and their impacts.
Available from: http://www.nap.edu/issues/13.4/schmit.htm
Results Page: 1
|
