Amami Is. (Amami Oshima Islands)
The local government began to trap the mongoose in order to reduce crop damage
in farmlands around the city from 1993 and the Yamato Village Office also began trapping from 1995. As many as 1100-1500 mongooses were captured by 15-20 trappers
using 10-30 traps per person for seven to nine months
(May-March) in a year. Approximately 60-80%
of those mongooses were captured by four to five skilful
Agency of the Central Government carried out preliminary
investigations during 1996-1999 into the possibility
of eradicating mongooses from the whole island. Following on from the pilot investigations, the Environment Agency decided to begin a full-scale project to eradicate
the mongoose from the whole island from 2000 by
two methods: (1) great reduction of population using many
traps during a short period (3 years) over the whole island
(the annual target reduction was 4000-5000, including the
number by pest control around farmland by the local governments
during May to March, and by trapping in mountainous
areas by the Environment Agency during October
to March), and (2) long-term eradication until the species
A total of 3886 mongooses were captured by trapping, but
the number was lower (87%) than the target number (4500)
in the first year (fiscal 2000). The catch comprised 1073
animals by pest control and 2813 by the eradication project
of the Environment Agency.
Fajou Is. (Reserve Naturelle du Grand Cul-de-sac Marin)
In March 2001, an attempt was made to eradicate the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes javanicus), the ship rat (Rattus rattus) and the house mouse (Mus musculus) from Fajou island in Guadeloupe. A follow up in December 2001 and January 2002 showed that the ship rat eradication had failed. There was a second attempt at eradicating the ship rats in March 2002, but it seems that it also failed. However it confirmed the success of the mongoose operation using traps alone. The success of the March 2001 house mouse operation using trapping and poisoning (Bromadiolone concentration 50 ppm, hand broadcast ) could not be properly evaluated (Lorvelec, O., et al. 2004).
Live traps are also used to capture mongooses and avoid loss of non-target species in Haleakala National Park, Hawaii.
Small Indian mongooses are currently controlled using simple box traps, which has achieved some success despite being labour intensive. In the National Park in south-west Mauritius, trapping is carried out in four main areas where the pink pigeon (Columba mayeri) is present. Brise Fer has had 24 traps since 1988, Pigeon Wood has had 23 traps since 1991, Bel Ombre had had 22 traps since 1994, and Combo has had an unknown number of traps since 1999. Non-target species are sometimes caught, especially the tenrec (Tenrec eucaudatus). Future recommendations for mongoose management include a minimum trap density of one trap every 0.25 km², and placing more than one trap at each site to reduce the effects of catching non-target species. Control is best focussed on mongooses in degraded forest, as this appears to be where they reach their highest densities. Control of mongooses should be integrated with control of other invasive vertebrates such as rats and cats, as controlling mongooses alone may release rats from predation pressure and cats from competition for prey. Other potential techniques could be the use of poison, as has been successfully done in Hawaii, and habitat management, by removing denser ground vegetation and removing potential den sites. Any poisoning campaign would need to exploit behaviours unique to mongooses in order to reduce non-target impacts.
St. John Is.
Coblentz and Coblentz (1985) trapped mongooses using 15 x 15 x 45 cm live traps and fresh bait. They concluded that, where eradication of mongooses is not possible, protection of vulnerable insular species can be achieved with intensive localised trapping
Herpestes auropunctatus is commonly known as the small Indian mongoose; Indian mongoose; Javan mongoose.
1. Algar, D. and Burrows, N.D. 2004. Feral cat control research: Western Shield review, February 2003. Conservation Science Western Australia 5:131–163.
2. Algar, D.; Angus, G.J.; Brazell, R.I.; Gilbert, C. and Withnell, G.B. 2001. Farewell felines of Faure. Report to Australian Wildlife Conservancy. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wanneroo, Western Australia. 12 pp.
5. Barun, A.; Budinski, I. and Simberloff, D. 2008. A ticking time-bomb? The small Indian mongoose in Europe. Aliens 26:14-16.
7. Campbell, K.J.; Harper, G.; Algar, D.; Hanson, C.C.; Keitt, B.S. and Robinson, S. 2011. Review of feral cat eradications on islands. In: Veitch, C.R.; Clout, M.N. and Towns, D.R. (eds.). Island invasives: Eradication and Management, IUCN, (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp. XX.
8. Coblentz, B. E. and Coblentz, B. A 1985. Control of the Indian mongoose Herpestes auropunctatus on St John, US Virgin Islands. Biological Conservation 33: 281– 288.
9. Creekmore, T. E., Linhart, S. B., Corn, J. L., Whitney, M. D., Snyder, B. D. and Nettles, V. F. 1994. Field-evaluation of baits and baiting strategies for delivering oral vaccine to mongooses in Antigua, West Indies. Journal Of Wildlife Diseases 30: 497-505.
10. Daltry J.C., 2006. Reintroduction of the critically endangered Antiguan racer Alsophis antiguae to Green Island, Antigua. Conservation Evidence, 2006. 3, 36-38. www.ConservationEvidence.com
11. Daltry J.C., 2006. Reintroduction of the critically endangered Antiguan Racer Alsophis antiguae to Rabbit Island, Antigua. Conservation Evidence, 2006 3, 33-35 www.ConservationEvidence.com.
12. Fisher, P. and O’Connor C. 2007. Oral toxicity of paminopropiophenone to ferrets. Wildlife Research 34:19-24.
13. Funakoshi, K.; Kubo, S.; Nakumo, S.; Shioya, K.; Okada, S., 2007. The distribution of invasive small Indian mongooses, Herpestes javanicus, on Amami-Ohshima Island based on the use of tracking-tunnels. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology [Jap. J. Conserv. Ecol.]. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 156-162. Nov 2007.
14. Genovesi, P. 2007. Limits and potentialities of eradication as a tool for addressing biological invasions. In: Nentwig, W. (ed.). Biological Invasions, Ecological Studies 193, Springer, pp 385-400.
15. Gorman, M. L. 1976a. A mechanism for individual recogniton by odour in Herpestes auropunctatus (Carnivora: Viverridae). Animal Behavior. 24:141–146.
16. Gorman, M. L. 1976b. Seasonal changes in the reproductive pattern of feral Herpestes auropunctatus (Carnivora: Viveridae), in the Fijian islands. Journal of Zoology 178:237–246.
17. Hanson, C. C. 2007. Restoring the Goat Islands for creating a suitable environment for reintroducing Jamaican iguanas: goat, cat, and mongoose eradication plan - 2007-DRAFT-03. Unpublished Report, Island Conservation, Santa Cruz, CA.
18. Hays, W.S.T. and Conant, S. 2003. Male social activity in the small Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus. Acta Theriologica 48:485-494.
19. Henderson, R.W. and Berg, C.S. 2006. The herpetofauna of Grenada and the Grenada Grenadines: Conservation concerns. Applied Herpetology 3:197-213.
20. Howald, G.; Donlan, C.; Galvan J.; Russel, J.; Parkes, J.; Samaniego, A.; Wang, Y.; Veitch, D.; Genovesi, P.; Pascal, M.; Saunders, A. and Tershy B. 2007. Invasive rodent eradication on islands. Conservation Biology 21:1258-1268.
21. Ishii, N. 2003. Controlling mongooses introduced to Amami-Oshima Island: a population estimate and program evaluation. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 8:73-82. (in Japanese)
22. IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4.
摘要： The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species provides taxonomic, conservation status and distribution information on taxa that have been globally evaluated using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. This system is designed to determine the relative risk of extinction, and the main purpose of the IUCN Red List is to catalogue and highlight those taxa that are facing a higher risk of global extinction (i.e. those listed as Critically Endangered, Endangered and Vulnerable). The IUCN Red List also includes information on taxa that are categorized as Extinct or Extinct in the Wild; on taxa that cannot be evaluated because of insufficient information (i.e. are Data Deficient); and on taxa that are either close to meeting the threatened thresholds or that would be threatened were it not for an ongoing taxon-specific conservation programme (i.e. are Near Threatened).
Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/ [Accessed 25 May 2011]
23. IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)., 2010. A Compilation of Information Sources for Conservation Managers.
摘要： This compilation of information sources can be sorted on keywords for example: Baits & Lures, Non Target Species, Eradication, Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Weeds, Herbicides etc. This compilation is at present in Excel format, this will be web-enabled as a searchable database shortly. This version of the database has been developed by the IUCN SSC ISSG as part of an Overseas Territories Environmental Programme funded project XOT603 in partnership with the Cayman Islands Government - Department of Environment. The compilation is a work under progress, the ISSG will manage, maintain and enhance the database with current and newly published information, reports, journal articles etc.
24. Johnston, M.; Algar, D.; O’Donoghue, M. and Morris, J. 2011. Field efficacy of the Curiosity feral cat bait on three Australian islands. In: Veitch, C.R.; Clout, M.N. and Towns, D.R. (eds.). Island invasives: Eradication and Management, IUCN, (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp. XX.
25. Kotaka, Nobuhiko; Kudaka, Masakazu; Takehara, Kenji; Sato, Hiroki, 2009. Ground use pattern by forest animals and vulnerability toward invasion by Herpestes javanicus into Yambaru, northern Okinawa Island, southern Japan. Japanese Journal of Ornithology. 58(1). APR 2009. 28-45.
26. Kusuda, Satoshi; Hoson, Osamu; Nakaya, Yumiko; Ogura, Go; Oshiro, Seikou; Takara, Junji; Matsuda, Ayano; Doi, Osamu; Nagamine, Takashi; Murata, Koichi, 2010. Induced estrus in female small Asian mongooses (Herpestes javanicus) for the purpose of controlling invasive alien species in Okinawa Island Mammal Study. 35(3). SEP 2010. 217-219.
27. Leighton, P. A.; Horrocks, J. A.; Kramer, D. L., 2011. Predicting nest survival in sea turtles: when and where are eggs most vulnerable to predation? Animal Conservation. 14(2). APR 2011. 186-195.
28. Leighton, Patrick A.; Horrocks, Julia A.; Kramer, Donald L., 2009. How depth alters detection and capture of buried prey: exploitation of sea turtle eggs by mongooses. Behavioral Ecology. 20(6). NOV-DEC 2009. 1299-1306.
29. Leighton, Patrick A.; Horrocks, Julia A.; Kramer, Donald L., 2010. Conservation and the scarecrow effect: Can human activity benefit threatened species by displacing predators? Biological Conservation. 143(9). SEP 2010. 2156-2163.
30. Leighton, Patrick A.; Horrocks, Julia A.; Krueger, Barry H.; Beggs, Jennifer A.; Kramer, Donald L., 2008. Predicting species interactions from edge responses: mongoose predation on hawksbill sea turtle nests in fragmented beach habitat. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B. 275(1650). NOV 7 2008. 2465-2472.
31. Linhart, S.B. 1993. Bait formulation and distribution for oral rabies vaccination of domestic dogs: an overview. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 60:479–490.
32. Linhart, S.B.; Baer, G.M.; Balderas Torres, J.M.; Engeman, R.M.; Collins, E.F.; Meslin, F. X.; Schumacher, C.L.; Taweel (el-), A.H. and Wlodkowski, J.C. 1997. Acceptance of candidate baits by domestic dogs for delivery of oral rabies vaccines. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 64:115-124.
33. Linhart, S.B.; Creekmore, T.E.; Corn, J.L.; Whitney, M.D.; Snyder, B.D. and Nettles, V.F. 1993. Evaluation of baits for oral rabies vaccination of mongooses: Pilot field trials in Antigua, West Indies. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 29:290–294.
34. Lorvelec, O., Delloue, X., Pascal, M., & mege, S. 2004. Impacts des mammiferes allochtones sur quelques especes autochtones de l'Isle Fajou (Reserve Naturelle du Grand Cul-de-sac Marin, Guadeloupe), etablis a l'issue d'une tentative d'eradication. Revue D'Ecologie - La Terre et La Vie 59(1-2): 293-307.
摘要： French language. Information about impacts, eradication methodology, results and discussion in French.
35. Louette, M. 1987. Poissons dulcaquicoles, batraciens, rep- tiles et mammiferes de l'archipel des Comores. Ya Mkobe 3:4-7.
36. Marks, C.A.; Johnston, M.J.; Fisher, P.M.; Pontin, K. and Shaw, M.J. 2006. Differential particle size ingestion: promoting target-specific baiting of feral cats. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1119-1124.
37. McNair, D.B. 2003. Population estimate, habitat associations, and conservation of the St. Croix ground lizard Ameiva polops at Protestant Cay, United States Virgin Islands. Caribbean Journal of Science 39:94-99
38. Morley, C.G. 2004. Has the invasive mongoose Herpestes javanicus yet reached the island of Taveuni, Fiji? Oryx 38:457–460.
39. Morrison, C.Morrison, C.; Naikatini, A.Naikatini, A.; Thomas, N.Thomas, N.; Rounds, I.Rounds, I.; Thaman, B.Thaman, B.; Niukula, J.Niukula, J., 2004. Rediscovery of an endangered frog Platymantis vitianus, on mainland Fiji: implications for conservation and management. Pacific Conservation Biology. 10(4). 2004. 237-240.
40. Murphy, E.C.; Eason, C.T.; Hix, S. and MacMorran, D. 2007. Developing a new toxin for potential control of feral cats, stoats and wild dogs in New Zealand. In: Witmer, G.W.; Pitt W.C. and Fagerstone K.A. (eds.). Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species: Proceedings of an International Symposium. USDA/APHIS Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
41. Murphy, E.C.; Shapiro, L.; Hix, S.; MacMorran, D. and Eason, C.T. 2011. Control and eradication of feral cats: field trials of a new toxin. In: Veitch, C.R.; Clout, M.N. and Towns, D.R. (eds.). Island Invasives: Eradication and Management, IUCN, (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp. XX.
43. Perry G. & G.P. Gerber, 2006. Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in the British Virgin Islands: Status and patterns. Applied Herpetology 3: 237-256
44. Peters, D.; Wilson, L.; Mosher, S.; Rohrer, J.; Hanley, J.; Nadig, A.; Silbernagle, M.; Nishimoto, M. and Jeffrey, J. 2011. Small Indian mongoose – management and eradication using DOC 250 kill traps, first lessons from Hawaii. In: Veitch, C.R.; Clout, M.N. and Towns, D.R. (eds.). Island Invasives: Eradication and Management. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp. XX.
45. Pimentel, D. 1955b. The control of the mongoose in Puerto Rico. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 4:147-151.
46. Pitt, W.C. and Sugihara, R.T. 2009. Spatial (foraging distance) and temporal (time and frequency of visitation) responses of marked small Indian mongooses (Herpestes auropunctatus) to selected food baits in Hawaii. USDA, APHIS, WS, NWRC. Hilo, HI, 81 pp.
47. Powell, R. and Henderson, R.W. 2005. Conservation status of Lesser Antillean reptiles. Iguana 12:2-17.
49. Roy, Sugoto; Smith, Graham C.; Russell, James C., 2009. The eradication of invasive mammal species: can adaptive resource management fill the gaps in our knowledge? Human-Wildlife Conflicts. 3(1). SPR 2009. 30-40.
50. Ryoji Fukuhara, Takako Yamaguchia, Hiromi Ukutab, Sugot Roy, Junichi Tanakaa and Go Ogura, 2010. Development and introduction of detection dogs in surveying for scats of small Indian mongoose as invasive alien species. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research Volume 5, Issue 2, March-April 2010, Pages 101-111
51. Saito, Mika; Nakata, Katsushi; Nishijima, Taku; Yamashita, Katsuhiro; Saito, Anna; Ogura, Go., 2009. Proposal for Japanese Encephalitis Surveillance Using Captured Invasive Mongooses Under an Eradication Project on Okinawa Island, Japan. Vector-Borne & Zoonotic Diseases. 9(3). JUN 2009. 259-266.
52. Savarie, P. J.; Ping Pan, H.; Hayes, D. J.; Roberts, J. D.; Dasch, G. L.; Felton, R. and Schafer Jr. E. W. 1983. Comparative acute oral toxicity of paraaminopropiophenone. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 30:122-126.
53. Smith, D.G.; Polhemus, J.T. and VanderWerf, E.A. 2000. Efficacy of fish-flavored diphacinone bait blocks for controlling small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) populations in Hawaii. `Elepaio 60:47-51.
54. Soubeyran, Y. 2008. Espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les collectivités françaises d'outre-mer (Etat des lieux et recommandations). Collection Planête Nature. Comité français de l'UICN. Paris, 202 pp.
55. Stone, C.P.; Dusek, M., and Aeder, M. 1994. Use of an anticoagulant to control mongooses in nene breeding habitat. `Elepaio 54:73–78.
56. Thulin, C.-G.; Gyllenstrand, N.; McCracken, G.; Simberloff, D., 2002. Highly variable microsatellite loci for studies of introduced populations of the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes javanicus). Molecular Ecology Notes. 2(4). December 2002. 453-455.
57. USFWS. 2005. Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, Second Draft of Second Revision. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
59. Walsh, M.T. 2007. Island subsistence: hunting trapping and translocation of wildlife in the Western Indian Ocean. Azania 42:83-113.
60. Watari, Yuya; Junco Nagata & Kimitake Funakoshi, 2011. New detection of a 30-year-old population of introduced mongoose Herpestes auropunctatus on Kyushu Island, Japan. Biol Invasions (2011) 13:269–276
61. Wegmann, A.; Buckelew, S.; Howald, G.; Helm, J.; and Swinnerton, K. 2011. Rodent eradication campaigns on tropical islands: novel challenges and possible solutions. In: Veitch, C.R.; Clout, M.N. and Towns, D.R. (eds.). Island Invasives: Eradication and Management, IUCN, (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp. XX.