管理信息
使用钠 monofluoracetate(1080)毒杀，是最流行的方法来控制野生猪。大多数猪在摄取后四小时内会呕吐。呕吐物可能对非目标生物很危险，呕吐也可能造成猪的存活。使用高剂量反呕吐剂，例如 metoclopramide 、 thiethylperazine 与 prochlorperazine 可预防呕吐。
夏末可用伪狂犬病和布鲁氏菌疫苗，放在鱼粉里当诱饵(当自然食物供应量低），以控制这些疾病。
在1900年中期新西兰保育人员使用大陆狩猎技术，以消除小岛野猪的数量。最近毒杀技术已发展到控制或消灭野生猪的数量。(Choquenot et al., 1990; O'Brien 与 Lukins, 1990, 在 Cruzet al.2005) 狩猎和毒杀技术结合使用，有利于消除较大岛上的猪。在夏威夷，哈雷阿卡拉国家公园偏辟的热带雨林，用网子诱捕已被用来控制猪在600-800平方公里内的围栏围栏。许多人把猪视为高文化价值的（即：利用它们作为方便的食物来源），以致于想从指定地区移除他们，可能不被接受，如果没有一个明确好处。以陷阱捕捉，将不会是一个永远可以接受的控制方法。此外，一个事实，即猪是具有高度流动性，因此由个别地主或控制机构来控制他们是指不经济的（猪会迅速从邻近地区移入）。
圣地亚哥岛加拉帕戈斯群岛（厄瓜多尔外海）有很多具智慧和洞察力的移除案例。已知成功移除岛上野猪的关键因素是：(1)持续不断的努力(2)，一个有效的毒杀活动 (3)、一个狩猎计划 ,(4)开发更多小径以接近它,(5) 强化监督程序。在整个70年代和80年代，猎杀的努力很低(< 500 hunter-days/year)，而在20世纪90年代初努力增加，但并不固定。相比之下，1990年代中期修正后的控制行动，造成了持续的，全年最少每天猎杀1500头。猎杀猪的猎径是重要的。需开辟额外的猎径，并且不猎杀山羊，以便压制植被（好让猎人和狗进入岛屿所有的地区） 激励猎人是一个持续的挑战，尤其是当猪的密度低时。然而，社会、道德的倡导活动与财政奖励，可以维持猎人动机。而毒杀相较于猎杀，杀较少的猪，但是毒杀成本低，具有成本效益。毒杀使用的化合物对大多数物种都有毒，使用的利弊，应与对非目标物种的冲击达成平衡。在2000年，最后一头猪被射杀，最后一头猪被毒杀后 6个月，开始密集的监测工作。持续不断的监测工作对移除是至关重要的。缺乏如此的一个努力是负责许多根除失败。(Campbell et al., 2004, 在 Cruz et al.2005)   
地点特有的管理信息Aorangi Is. (Poor Knights Islands)
Feral pigs were eradicated from Aorangi in the 1930s. Australia
The problem associated with the illegal movement of feral species by private individuals is a growing concern to agricultural and wildlife agencies, and has been recognized for several decades (Caley 1997, Pavlov 1998 in Spencer and Hampton 2005). The detection of deliberate translocations may allow for better control (policing) of this highly destructive and invasive species (Spencer and Hampton 2005).
Semi-arid grazing systems in Australia are characterized by low and erratic rainfall, high summer temperatures and an evaporation rate that exceeds rainfall (Robertson 1987, in Dexter 2003). In these environments, the rate of change in herbivore abundance is heavily dependent upon prevailing vegetation biomass (Bayliss 1985, in Dexter 2003), which is in turn largely dependent on unpredictable rainfall fluctuations (Noy-Meir 1973, in Dexter 2003). In the case of feral pigs in the semi-arid rangelands of Australia, prevailing environmental conditions influence population dynamics through their effect on mortality rate rather than fecundity (Choquenot 1998, in Dexter 2003). Risk of spread of foot and mouth disease should be calculated by considering criteria such as proximity to ports, feral pig density and the likelihood of detection. To this could be added seasonal conditions with good conditions increasing an areas risk ranking and poor seasonal conditions lowering an area's risk ranking. Total pig eradication may not be practical on a regional or local scale ( Dexter 2003). Chile
The wild boar is subject to a population control programme in the Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park. Clarion Is. (Islas Revillagigedo)
If rabbits, sheep and pigs are eradicated from Clarion Island, the vegetation is likely to recover. However, there are currently small populations of noxious weed species such as Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) and bufflegrass (Cenchrus echinatus) which may spread if released from herbivory. Galapagos Islands
The Galapagos National Park Service (GNPS), and the Charles Darwin Foundation (CDF), both created in 1959, focused on the conservation of the giant tortoises as one of their first priorities – the CDF carrying out research to support management activities carried out by the GNPS. In 1964, the CDF established the Charles Darwin Research Station (CDRS) in Galapagos and within a year established an ex-situ tortoise-breeding centre. The first Santiago island tortoise eggs were brought to the breeding centre in 1970 for hatching and rearing (Cruz et al., 1999). By 1973, active pig control campaigns were established on Santiago in an effort to increase natural recruitment rates.
By the end of 1996, sporadic control efforts been on-going for 24 years. During that time, 18,903 pigs were removed from Santiago (Calvopiña, J. 1985, Calvopiña, L. 1989, Isabela Project, 2000) and a valuable study on pig distribution, reproduction and territoriality was conducted (Coblentz, B. and D.W. Baber, 1987). However, during the few years prior to 1997, especially from 1991 to 1994, funds were cut back and enthusiasm waned, resulting in dramatic reduction in hunting effort.
The passing of the Special Law for Galapagos in 1998 provided the GNPS with steady and guaranteed funding for its operations. By the second half of the 1990’s, the CDRS had begun to apply global positioning system (GPS) and geographic information system technologies (GIS) to field work. With trails, radios and GPS units, hunters could now range freely throughout pig habitat, coordinate their movements with extreme precision, and increase the overall pig hunting effectiveness. Typical of an eradication campaign, as the density of the target species dropped, the effort required per individual removed increased. The rapid increase in effort required to remove individuals in the final years of the Santiago campaign resulted in a 450 grearter effort needed to remove a pig in 2000 (compared to 1988). Hawaii
Sport hunting of feral pigs had no significant impact on pig numbers. Hawaii
Anderson and Stone (1993) used snaring to control feral pig activity on Hawaii. It proved to be the most effective way of removing pigs in the study area. Hunters with dogs were also used to kill pigs that became trap shy. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park
Feral pigs were systematically removed from the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. The removal began in 1980 when 175 pigs were removed from the area. The main control method used was hunting with dogs. This study shows that continual control with high removal rates can effectively eradicate or reduce feral pigs to low levels within a few years, but periodic control is less successful. Hunts conducted during breeding and farrowing periods are more successful because capturing entire family groups is more probable during these times (Katahira Finnegan and Stone 1993, in Wolf and Conover 2003).
In Hawaii Volcanoes National Park the goal was to eradicate pigs from the area through exclusion hunting, fencing snaring and trapping. The pigs were successfully eradicated in three of the management areas in HAVO and populations were reduced in other areas (Hone and Stone 1989, in Wolf and Conover 2003). Kowhai Valley
Controlling stoats within the two remaining colonies is unlikely to assist in the conservation of Hutton's shearwater. Conservation efforts would be better spent protecting the two remaining colonies from pigs and in trying to establish new breeding sites. Lord Howe Is.
Feral pigs were eradicated from Lord Howe Island by the 1980s. Maui Is.
Management is recommended principally because the feral pig disrupts and destroys native forests and replaces native ecosystems with the exotic strawberry guava which it effectively disperses (Diong 1982). Mauritius
Conservation Management Areas were fenced off to protect native flora and fauna from invasive species, including Sus scrofa. In the area of Mare Longue, this was relatively unsuccessful as rocks were not placed at the foot of the fence, which allowed pigs to burrow into the plot. Mauritius
Wild boar are excluded from Conservation Management Areas (CMAs) in Mauritius by 2 m high galvanised steel fences, permitting regeneration of native forest trees. Mont Panié
A three year feasibility project initiated in 2003 by pest control specialists from the Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG, IUCN) has focussed on the 5000 hectare Mont Panié Botanical Reserve and has investigated the control of pest mammals in north-eastern New Caledonia. In 2004 the project control techniques focusing on feral pigs and rats were investigated. During September and October 2005 field trials were undertaken to test the efficacy of pig, rat and cat control. Trained local people and Department of Conservation specialists undertook an intensive rat trapping programme within a 100 hectare site at Thoven during September and October 2005. A number of feral cats were also trapped within the experimental trapping area. Results from the investigations and trials suggest there is potential to effectively control a range of pest mammals on Mont Panié. Whilst trapping and exclusion fencing could be used in some situations, it is proposed that hunting pigs with trained dogs would be most effective in reducing the impact of pigs on tribal gardens. Montserrat
Forestry Department has begun shooting pigs in some forest areas (Martin, 2003 in Varnham, 2006). This action appears to have either reduced numbers and range of pigs or caused them to become more shy, and the control effort has now largely ceased (Hilton, 2004 in Varnham, 2006). Eradication is considered imperative and is strongly recommended to be carried out in near future while numbers are still relatively low (Hilton, 2004 in Varnham, 2006). Namadgi National Park
Control of pigs was accomplished with bait stations containing warfarin poisoned grain. We are experiencing technical difficulties and unable to complete your request. Please try later.
Source: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers
Error: -2147217900 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'and'.
Query: select * from L_location , LT_locationtype
where L_locationID =
and L_typeID = LT_Typeid
order by LT_Order ASC
File: /database/species/management_info.asp
Host: www.issg.org
URL: /database/species/management_info.asp
Referer:
Remote IP: 67.202.9.192
Server IP: 130.216.35.142
Request: si=73&fr=1&sts=sss&lang=SC
si=73
fr=1
sts=sss
lang=SC
|
