Global Invasive Species Database 100 of the worst Donations home
Standard Search Standard Search Taxonomic Search   Index Search

   Undaria pinnatifida (水生植物, 藻类)  English   
生态 分布 管理 影响 参考数据 联系


         管理信息

    预防措施:裙带菜的生命周期中有一个微观的阶段,一般认为不可能成功移除此物种。因此裙带菜的管理策略,将偏重减慢它的扩展与减少它散布到新地点的机会。除了自然散布,人类居间载体的角色; 压舱水,附着在船壳、航海设备等等,在裙带菜的传布中担任一个主要的角色。载体管理与了解,在减慢它的传布方面,将会是一条漫长的路。长期来看,希望将来有用紫外线光或者高压、热水处理船壳的系统机制,能快速有效地杀死孢子与细菌。(MPA NEWS, December 2004/ January 2005)

    一项由环境与资产部 (澳洲)委托,国民健康科学与工业研究组织 (CSIRO)执行两年的研究计划,将发现在澳洲水域内的入侵海洋生物与那些不在澳洲水域里面的入侵海洋生物,确认出来而且依等级排列。
    在此报告中,所有非本土的潜在目标品种区分为高优先、中优先和低优先,依据他们的入侵与冲击潜力。国内潜在目标种的危险排名从传染到不受传染的生物区,确认 裙带菜(Undaria pinnatifida)是一个 "中级优先品种 "- 这些品种有一个合理的高冲击性或入侵潜能。
    为更多的细节,请参阅Hayes et al.2005个 .
    Hayes et al.2005 决定的排名,将被澳洲国家入侵海洋生物管制群使用,用来协助发展国家控制计划,控制计划将包括控制方法选择、移除与长期管理。 English   



         地点特有的管理信息
    Auckland Region (North Island)
    The Parks and Heritage Committee of the Auckland Regional Council (ARC) has asked for a report in August 2005 on the distribution of the seaweed in the Auckland region and the estimated costs of eradicating or controlling it (ARC: Media release, 13th July 2005).
    A delimitation survey carried out between July 14th and 22nd 2005 found undaria on only one site outside the harbour, on Kawau Island. The infestation at one jetty was found to be extensive but contained. The Parks and Heritage Committee of the ARC who believe that the infestation can be eradicated estimate the immediate cost of removal to be between $20,000 to $40,000. An estimate for an integrated management option to prevent the spread of undaris to high value sites within the region is between $1.62million and $2.67million (ARC: Media release, 10th August 2005).
    Chatham Is. (Chatham Islands)
    Report on Eradication: The remoteness of the Chatham Islands has helped protect it from exotic species,including undaria, an unwanted seaweed already established in New Zealand. So it was a potential disaster when in March 2000, a fishing boat sank with undaria on its hull. Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand ordered the vessel to be moved (using its powers under the Biosecurity Act) but weather prevented salvage attempts.MFish then decided to use new treatment techniques to eradicate the seaweed from the hull. The hull was heat-treated (effectively,the vessel was ‘cooked ’) to kill the microscopic stages of undaria, which can’t survive high temperatures. Plywood boxes with foam seals were attached to the hull by magnets. Electric elements (powered by a diesel generator on the surface support vessel) inside the boxes heated the seawater to 70 ºC for 10 minutes, with a flame torch used for inaccessible areas. It took divers four weeks to complete the treatment, but a monthly monitoring programme over three years indicates the eradication has been entirely successful. The Chatham Islands’ shoreline has been surveyed regularly for undaria and no plants have been found.
    Monterey Harbor
    Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS), off the US state of California, is working to fight the invasion of a seaweed species that has colonized a harbor neighboring the MPA, and personnel recognize the challenge they face. At the time of the colony’s discovery, Monterey Harbor was already host to dozens of documented alien species, although no concerted eradication attempts had yet been made by authorities. But Undaria — with its rapid growth and high fecundity, among other characteristics — was particularly viewed as a potential threat to the sanctuary’s native kelp forests located nearby.
    With the invasion localized to the harbor at that point, MBNMS moved to address it and, if possible, eradicate it. First, researchers determined the extent of the colonization. “Initially several individuals were found, but subsequent searches in late 2001 and early 2002 indicated that Undaria was more broadly distributed in the harbor than had originally been thought,” says Steve Lonhart, scientist with MBNMS.
    State and sanctuary officials launched a formal Undaria management program in October 2002. It has involved a team of volunteer divers removing Undaria manually from harbor docks and pilings, with research volunteers collecting data on Undaria locations. So far it appears that the Undaria is keeping pace with the eradication effort. “Given its spread from the center of the harbor to adjacent areas, it is likely that spores are being carried beyond the confines of the harbor,” says Lonhart.
    He recognizes that eradication of the plant is not possible unless the vector of transmission — vessel hulls in this case — is addressed. “Even if all Undaria were removed from Monterey Harbor, there are no mechanisms in place to prevent reintroduction by vessels entering from infected harbors in Southern California,” says Lonhart. “Thus eradication is not a viable option. However, management of the population can reduce the rate of spread to the adjacent open coast and to harbors north of Monterey, and this is currently the main objective.”
    One management option would be to develop a market for the harbor’s Undaria, which is commercially grown elsewhere in the world and used in miso soup. Lonhart says a local export company determined that samples of the Monterey Undaria were suitable for human consumption, but that the amount in the harbor was too low so far to be commercially feasible. The concept of harvesting Undaria as food for farmed abalone has also been considered, although it would need to be done in a way to avoid spreading Undaria spores in the process.
    Considering the likely vector by which Undaria arrived, would hull-cleaning programs be an option for the sanctuary, including to prevent introduction of additional aliens? Lonhart says that is unlikely. “A program to clean vessels would require a tremendous amount of infrastructure (e.g., a location for inspecting hulls, cleaning them, and managing this information), a significant long-term financial investment, and a program to monitor its success,” he says. Unlike the remote Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve, simply too many vessels use Monterey Harbor to make such a program possible, for now. Lonhart hopes that eventually there could be systems to treat vessel hulls with UV light or high-pressure, heated water to kill harmful spores and bacteria quickly and efficiently. In the meantime, MBNMS is monitoring Undaria’s spread and its eventual interaction with the native kelp (MPA NEWS, December 2004/ January 2005).
    Nelson
    U. pinnatifida is designated as a 'Regional surveillance pest' by the the Tasman-Nelson Regional Pest Management Strategy. The strategy has its effect over the combined area that lies within the administrative boundaries of the Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council. The objective of the strategy is to promote the control of Undaria and continue surveillance on its distribution. Another objective is to improve the public understanding of its impact and to provide advice and education to vessel owners on identifying and controlling Undaria. Please see Hierarchy of Plant Designations for an explanation of designation terminology.
    New Zealand
    An action plan developed by the Ministry of Fisheries includes the following steps to slow the spread of undaria in New Zealand:
    • Implementing vector management programmes in selected areas;
    • Educating a wide range of marine stakeholders on how to avoid spreading undaria;
    • Researching ways to treat vectors so as to minimise the amount of vector transported undaria; and
    • Supporting regional initiatives to control undaria by developing treatment methods and education material.
    Advice given to help reduce the spread of undaria are:
    • Applying antifouling paint to your boat’s hull regularly;
    • Regularly cleaning hulls in a facility with collection and land-based disposal of fouling material – preventing fouling from returning to the sea;
    • Cleaning fishing and aquaculture gear thoroughly and away from the sea before using it in a new locality;
    • Preventing the build up of fouling on buoys by allowing them to dry out occasionally;
    • Supporting the undaria management initiatives in your area.
    Snares Is./Tini Heke (sub-Antarctic) (New Zealand sub-Antarctic Islands)
    There are plans to conduct a survey of the surrounding area and neighbouring bay of the infected site, remove as many plants as could be found, investigate the plants’ maturity states and, through DNA testing, determine where the plants were transferred from. An assessment of eradication possibilities is being considered.
    Tasman District
    U. pinnatifida is designated as a 'Regional surveillance pest' by the the Tasman-Nelson Regional Pest Management Strategy. The strategy has its effect over the combined area that lies within the administrative boundaries of the Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council. The objective of the strategy is to promote the control of Undaria and continue surveillance on its distribution. Another objective is to improve the public understanding of its impact and to provide advice and education to vessel owners on identifying and controlling Undaria. Please see Hierarchy of Plant Designations for an explanation of designation terminology.
    Venice
    In order to evaluate the dynamics of substrate re-colonisation by undaria, two mechanical eradications were carried out during (March) and after the fertile period (July) of the algae in the lagoon of Venice. These experimental manipulations provided evidence of the fast re-colonisation potential of the algae mainly attributed to its efficient reproductive system. Eradication attempts made during the fertile period, in fact, permitted the kelp development during the following year, while re-colonisation has started 2 years later where eradication was performed after the reproductive period. A significant decrease in the surface covered by other species has been observed both in shallow (Ulva rigida, Enteromorpha spp., Antithamnion pectinatum, Chondracanthus acicularis) and deeper areas (Rhodymenia ardissonei) during the period of maximum development of U. pinnatifida. On the basis of the results of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) the alga U. pinnatifida is continuously expanding in lagoon environments of Venice; (2) in order to limit its spreading, mechanical eradications would be done on a large spatial scale and before the zoospores release; (3) there is suggestive evidence of competition between Undaria and the remaining indigenous algae.


         管理资源 /链接

    1. Brown, M. T. and Lamare, M. D. 1994. The distribution of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar within Timaru harbour, New Zealand. Japanese Journal of Phycology 42: 63-70.
    2. Castric Fey, A., Beaupoil, C., Bouchain, J., Pradier, E. and L'Hardy Halos, M. T. 1999. The introduced alga Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Alariaceae) in the rocky shore ecosystem of the St Malo area: morphology and growth of the sporophyte. Botanica Marina 42: 71-82.
    3. Castric Fey, A., Girard, A. and L'hardy Halos, M. T. 1993. The distribution of Undaria pinnatifida on the coast of the Saint Malo (Brittany, France). Botanica Marina 36: 351-358.
    4. Cecere, E., Petrocelli, A. and Saracino, O. D. 2000. Undaria pinnatifida (Fucophyceae, Laminariales) spread in the central Mediterranean: its occurrence in the Mar Piccolo of taranto (Ionian Sea, southern Italy). Cryptogamie, Algologie 21: 305-309.
    5. Curiel, D. Guidetti, P. Bellemo, G. Scattolin, M. Marzocchi, M. 2002. The introduced alga Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Alariaceae) in the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia. vol. 477, no. 1, pp. 209-219.
            摘要: Study on undaria invasion in Venice, Italy.
    6. Fletcher, R. L. and Farrell, P. 1999. Introduced brown algae in the North East Atlantic, with particular respect to Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 52: 259-275.
    7. Fletcher, R. L. and Manfredi, C. 1995. The occurrence of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) on the South Coast of England. Botanica Marina 38: 355-358.
    8. Floc'h, J. Y., Pajot, R. and Mouret, V. 1996. Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) 12 years after its introduction into the Atlantic Ocean. Hydrobiologia 326/327: 217-222.
    9. Floc'h, J. Y., Pajot, R. and Wallentinus, I. 1988. The Japanese brown alga Undaria pinnatifida on the coasts of France and the possibilities of its establishment in european waters. International Council Exploration Sea, CIES, Bergen 10 October 198. 16pp.
    10. Forrest, B. 2000. A management strategy for the Asian kelp Undaria? Aliens 12.
    11. Forrest, B. M., Brown, S. N., Taylor, M. D., Hurd, C. L. and Hay, C. H. 2000. The role of natural dispersal mechanisms in the spread of Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). Phycologia 39: 547-553
            摘要: Study of dispersal of Undaria pinnatifida.
    12. Hay, C. H. 1990. The dispersal of sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida by coastal shipping in new Zealand, and implications for further dispersal of Undaria in France. British Phycological Journal 25: 301-313.
    13. Hay, C. H. and Luckens, P. A. 1987. The Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyta, Laminariales) found in a New Zealand harbour. New Zealand Journal Botany 25: 364-366.
    20. Saito, Y. (1975). Undaria. IN: Advance of phycology in Japan, (Tokida, J., Hirose, H. Eds) Dr. W. Junk b.v., The Hague304-320.
    21. Sanderson, J. C. 1990. A preliminary survey of the distribution of the introduced macroalga, Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) suringar on the coast of Tasmania, Australia. Botanica Marina 33: 153-157.
    22. Silva, P.C. Woodfield, R.A. Cohen, A.N. Harris, L.H. Goddard, J.H.R. 2002. First report of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Biological Invasions vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 333-338.
            摘要: Distribution of undaria in the Pacific.
    23. Tasman District Council (TDC) 2001. Tasman-Nelson Regional Pest Management Strategy

         结果页: 1  


ISSG Landcare Research NBII IUCN University of Auckland