Taxonomic name: Vallisneria spiralis L.
Synonyms:
Common names: coiled vallisneria, eel grass (English), eelgrass (English), eelweed (English), tape grass (English), val (English)
Organism type: aquatic plant Vallisneria spp. commonly known as eelgrass are popular aquarium plants. They are submerged aquatic plants that can grow up to five metres. They grow in still or flowing water and form a dense monoculture that dominates from the bed of the water-body to the surface. Dense infestations may restrict recreational activities, cause flooding and silting and reduce the aesthetic appeal of a body of water. Description
Eelgrasses are submerged rhizomatous (but not tuberous) aquatic plants, producing rosettes of long strap-like leaves which can vary in length from a few centimetres to 5.5 metres in deep water. Rooted or anchored in sediment they have no leafy stem; leaves all arise from a basal rosette at the sediment surface. Leaves have many small longitudinal veinlets and cross-septa, from 0.4-1cm wide. Plants form stout rhizomes that extend from the sediments. Numerous roots, up to 40cm long, sprout at each leaf-bearing node on the rhizomes (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b). The sexes are on different plants, the male flowers released and free-floating and the female with a spiral peduncle.
Juvenile or sterile specimens may be difficult to distinguish (Warrington 1994). Occurs in:
estuarine habitats, lakes, water courses, wetlands Habitat description
Coastal wetlands, lakes, and rivers General impacts
Eelgrasses are submerged aquatic plants that can grow up to five metres. They grow in still or flowing water and form a dense monoculture that dominates from the bed of the water-body to the surface. Dense infestations may restrict recreational activities, cause flooding and silting and reduce the aesthetic appeal of a body of water. Uses
Rooted submerged species, especially those that yield high biomass, such as some Vallisneria spp. are important in phytoremediation (biological remediation of environmental problems using plants) due to their soil-binding roots, rhizomes and stolons (which help facilitate colonisation by benthic algae, other microbes and invertebrates) (Qian et al. 1999, in Vajpayee et al 2001). A study conducted to evaluate the accumulation and toxicity of chromium (Cr) in V. spiralis found that after one week the plants ameliorated 59% of Cr from tannery effluent (which contains a high level of chromium). A higher level of remediation was obtained when the tannery effluent was diluted; 95% of Cr was removed from 25% effluent. It was concluded that V. spiralis effectively removes chromium by surface absorption or adsorption (incorporating it into its own system or storing it in a bound form). Therefore V. spiralis may be effective in bioremediation of diluted tannery effluent and in restoring contaminated wetlands; however safe disposal of contaminated plants in cemented vaults is recommended (Vajpayee et al. 2001). Notes
Vallisneria spiralis and Vallisneria nana are both known as “eelgrass” (S. Jacobs, pers.comm., 2006). Geographical range
Native to southern Europe (S. Jacobs, pers.comm., 2006). Introduction pathways to new locations
Aquaculture: The spread of this species to previously unaffected water bodies is normally the result of intentional plantings (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b).
Floating vegetation/debris: Waterfowl, flooding or human disturbance in flowing water can cause small fragments to break from the parent plant and form new colonies further downstream (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b). There is no evidence of viable seed being produced in New Zealand and any new infestations are formed vegetatively (ie: by the production of runners) (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b).
Local dispersal methods
Aquaculture (local): The spread of this species to previously unaffected water bodies is normally the result of intentional plantings (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b). Management information
Options for control of Vallisneria spp. include mechanical removal, (with weed harvesters or suction dredges), chemical control with herbicide, manipulation of the habitat by drainage or weed mats and biological control with agents such as grass carp (Environment B.O.P. Undated). However, biological control should be carefully considered in respect to all situation-specific biotic variables. Taking biological control out of context, especially when there is a lack of robust scientific data, might cause more damage to an ecosystem than it prevents. Froude (2002) notes that while some generalist herbivorous fish promoted as biocontrol agents will reduce the biomass of plants in an area, their browsing is not host-specific as they reduce both undesirable and favoured plants. As an example she mentions grass carp used to reduce aquatic plant biomass. Reproduction
There is no evidence of viable seed being produced in New Zealand and any new infestations are formed vegetatively (Greater Wellington Regional Council 2004b). Reviewed by: Dr. Surrey Jacobs Principal Research Scientist Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney NSW, Australia
Compiled by: IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) with support from the Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity Information System (TFBIS) Programme (Copyright statement)
|
|
Last Modified: Monday, 30 October 2006
|
