Global Invasive Species Database 100 of the worst Donations home
Standard Search Standard Search Taxonomic Search   Index Search

   Crepidula fornicata (mollusc)   
Ecology Distribution Management
Info
Impact
Info
References
and Links
Contacts


      Crepidula fornicata (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size   Crepidula fornicata on scallop (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size   Crepidula fornicata impact - with one scallop (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size   Effects of infestation of Crepidula fornicata (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size   Crepidula fornicata on scallop (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size   Crepidula fornicata impact - with one scallop (Photo: Erwan Amice) - Click for full size
    Taxonomic name: Crepidula fornicata (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Synonyms: Crepidula densata Conrad, Crepidula maculata Rigacci, Crepidula mexicana Rigacci, Crepidula nautiloides auct. non Lesson, Crepidula roseae Petuch, Crepidula violacea Rigacci, Crepidula virginica Conrad, Crypta nautarum Mörch, Patella fornicata Linné
    Common names: American limpet (Great Britain), common Atlantic slippersnail (USA), crépidule (France), oyster-pest (Great Britian), Pantoffelsnecke (Germany), slipper limpet (USA), Toffelsneg (Sweden)
    Organism type: mollusc
    Crepidula fornicata is a protandrous hermaphrodite mollusc, which means that the animals start their lives as males and then subsequently may change sex and develop into females. This species can tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions. Populations are particularly well developed in wave-protected areas such as bays, estuaries or sheltered sides of wave-exposed islands. C. fornicata competes with other filter-feeding invertebrates for food and space, and often occur in enormous numbers. Few management options are available to combat this species. Dredging operations to clear slipper limpets from oyster beds have been attempted in some areas, but it was concluded that further spread of the species could not be prevented.
    Description
    Crepidula fornicata's shell is oval, up to 5cm in length, with a much reduced spire. The large aperture has a shelf, or septum, extending half its length. The shell is smooth with irregular growth lines and white, cream, yellow or pinkish in colour with streaks or blotches of red or brown. C. fornicata are commonly found in curved chains of up to 12 animals. Large shells are found at the bottom of the chain, with the shells becoming progressively smaller towards the top MarLIN (2003).
    Similar Species
    Crepidula spp., Crepidula convexa, Crepidula onyx

    More
    Occurs in:
    coastland, estuarine habitats, marine habitats
    Habitat description
    Crepidula are often abundant in habitats such as shallow bays and the intertidal regions, where they may be exposed to rapid fluctuations in temperature and salinity, C. fornicata are common in the intertidal and shallow subtidal regions in New England and Canada, while they are exclusively subtidal in Florida (Collin 2001). Populations are particularly well developed in wave protected areas such as bays, estuaries or sheltered sides of wave exposed islands. The species is found on a variety of substrata but is most abundant in muddy or mixed muddy areas. C. fornicata may also, exist on sand or gravel bottoms in low energy environments, in which the accumulation of shells may lead to the formation of a biogenic hard substrate (CIESM, 2000).

    C. fornicata are found on a variety of substrata (rocks, gravel, sand, mud…) and also on metal, plastic, shelves…For metamorphosis, the larvae need a hard substrate, so the original substrat is sandy or gravely. But, when densities rise, the sediment becomes increasingly muddy and anoxic, because of their own bio-deposits and because stacks form traps for suspended matter. This would explain why maximal densities are found in mud (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005).
    Populations in Europe are mainly found in subtidal regions, between 0 and 20m (Blanchard, 1997, Thielteges)

    General impacts
    C. fornicata has been reported to alter sediment characteristics (by removing a huge volume of suspended organic material from the water column, and depositing that filtered material on the bottom as pseudofeces). It is also reported to decrease the abundance of certain suprabenthic species (such as mysids) (Vallet et al. 2003). Other studies (de Montaudouin et al. 1999), show that the presence of C. fornicata does not affect the benthic community and spatial competition with other macrozoobenthic species didn't occur, but that the habitat became more heterogeneous.

    JNCC (2002) states that, "C. fornicata competes with other filter-feeding invertebrates for food and space. It is considered a pest on commercial oyster beds, competing for space and food, while depositing mud on them and the mud rendering the substratum unsuitable for the settlement of spat." Some experimental studies de Montaudouin et al. (1999) conclude that the potential competition of C. fornicata with oysters (Ostrea edulis), populations did not show much overlap, and that C. fornicata provided the required niches for further hard-substrata species and that a rich association could be built on the initial basis of Crepidula alone that the competition of C. fornicata on oyster growth was negligible compared with the effect of competition by oysters themselves (intraspecific competition).

    Grall and Hall-Spencer (2003) state that C. fornicata is one of many reasons for the decline in local maerl bed habitats in Britain. Live maerl thalli become covered in Crepidula and the interstices of the deposit become clogged with silt; this kills the maerl thalli and dramatically alters associated maerl communities.
    The other major reason for the decline in local maerl bed habitats in Britain being industrial exploitation, first by sucking and dredging tons of living material and secondly by depositing overboard tons of suspension matter on or near the beds (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005).

    Le Pape et al. 2004 showed the negative effect of this invasive species on the density of young-of-the-year sole Solea solea in coastal nursery areas of the Bay of Biscay (France).

    Other impacts include increase in the levels of sediments; and, when limpet densities raise, the volumn of shell-attached fauna raises and endogean (domain immediately beneath the ground surface) fauna disappear regularly (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005).

    Uses
    Vallet et al. 2001 states that, "In the Bay of Saint-Brieuc, the presence of C. fornicata could have a major effect on the suprabenthic community by increasing species number and diversity. This suggests that, for slow swimmers such as decapods, dead and live individual shells of C. fornicata provide new habitats where they can hide." Grady et al. (2001) believe that, "C. fornicata could indicate age of host horseshoe crabs if horseshoe crabs have a terminal molt or do not molt often as adults, if C. fornicata remain on the same horseshoe crab, and if C. fornicata age can be determined with some degree of accuracy."
    Notes
    JNCC (2002) states that, "C. fornicata were introduced in association with imported American oysters Crassostrea virginica. This species may also be transported on ships' hulls, and in ballast water in the pelagic larval phase. Historic populations (now extinct) have also been introduced in association with the American hard-shelled clam Mercenaria mercenaria. In France, an order during a council in 1932 encouraged the destruction of C. fornicata. In Helford River (Essex), British authorities even set a price on C. fornicata, viz 5 shillings per limpet in 1949, but only 1 penny in 1953 due to the increasing proliferation (de Montaudouin et al., 1999).

    Other species belonging to the same family are: Europe – Mediterranean sea - C. unguiformis, C. moulinsi; Atlantic side of the U.S.A. - C. convexa, C. onyx, C. plana, C. maculosa, C. acta, C. janacus; Pacific side of the USA - C. grandis, C. aduncta, C. nummaria ; Central America - C. onyx, C. arenata, C. excavata, C. incurva, C. lessoni, C. striolata, C. uncata ; Southern America - C. philippiana, C. fecunda, C. dilatata, C. arenata, C. onyx, C. protea; Southern Africa - C. porcellana, C. rugosa, C. aculeata; Asia - C. onyx, C. walshi, C. grandis; New Zealand - C. costata, C. monoxyla; Australia - C. immersa, C. aculeata. (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005)

    Geographical range
    Native range: Atlantic Coast, the Pacific Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. States of Mississippi, Massachusetts, Florida, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas in the USA. Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick in Canada and, Mexico (MarLIN, 2003).
    Known introduced range: The Netherlands, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Spain (MarLIN, 2003).
    Introduction pathways to new locations
    Live food trade: JNCC (2002) states that, "Crepidula fornicata were introduced in association with imported American oysters
    Other: Collin (2001) states that, "These species are also known to occur on the carapaces of horseshoe crabs (personal observation and Botton and Ropes 1988, in Collin, 2001), which could result in occasional long distance dispersal."
    Ship ballast water: JNCC (2002) states that, "Crepidula fornicata may be transported in ballast water in the pelagic larval phase."
    Ship/boat hull fouling: JNCC (2002) states that, "Crepidula fornicata may also be transported on ships' hulls."


    Local dispersal methods
    Boat: Although Crepidula fornicata is dispersed on moving horseshoe crabs carapaces (Bottom and Ropes, 1988), on migrant crabs such as Maia squinado (Cole, 1952), or on all kind of movable living shells (Pecten maximus, Buccinum undatum…) as is observed in western Channel, fishing activities (trawling and dredging) are mainly responsible for dispersal of the limpets. Measurements in the Bay of Saint-Brieuc (France) showed that a single boat could disperse in hundred meters about one ton of limpets by day when dredging scallops (Blanchard, M., pers.comm., 2005).
    On animals: Collin (2001) states that, "These species are also known to occur on the carapaces of horseshoe crabs (personal observation and Botton & Ropes 1988, in Collin, 2001), which could result in occasional long distance dispersal."
    Management information
    Preventative measures: "Identifying potential marine pests – a deductive approach applied to Australia" ( Hayes, K.R., et al., 2002) presents an inductive hazard assessment protocol that is simple, does not require large amounts of data, and is capable of grouping hazardous species in to high, medium and low priority. Hazard priority is determined by the invasion potential and impact potential of the species. Invasion potential is expressed as the weighted sum of all vessel movements between Australia and ‘infected’ bioregions around the world. Impact potential is expressed in terms of human health, economic and ecological impacts. These were estimated using a web-based questionnaire sent to world-wide experts on each species investigated.
    The results of this analysis suggest the following hazard groups for Crepidula fornicata:
    Relative to human impacts: Low priority – low impact potential and low invasion potential
    Relative to ecological and economic impacts: Medium priority – low to medium impact potential and medium invasion potential.

    Mechanical: Management experiments have been attempted in response to the invasion of shell fisheries by C. fornicata. Dredging operations to clear slipper limpets from oyster beds have been attempted, but it was concluded that further spread of the species could not be prevented. Dredging involves removal of the surface layer of sediment. Studies suggest that this operation may impact maerl habitats more severely than proliferation of the gastropod itself since removal of live maerl cover results in long-term habitat damage (Grall and Hall-Spencer, 2000).

    Physical : In France, stocks of C. fornicata limpets are huge : 150, 000 metric tons in the Bay of Mount Saint-Michel, 250, 000 metric tons in the Bay of Saint-Brieuc, 50, 000 Metric tons in the Bay of Brest…A five year programme of industrial collection and treatment of Crepidula has been set by the fishermen and oyster-farmers of Brittany, in the more colonized areas, where biomasses overset 10kg m-2. The survey was conducted by IFREMER (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea). About 30, 000 metric tons were collected in a year, and treated for agricultural use, and for calcareous and organic ground enrichment (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005).

    Nutrition
    Crepidula fornicata is a suspension-feeder, which is rare for a marine gastropod and is the reason for its spread in eutrophised bays and estuaries (eutrophication may be described as pollution resulting from an excess of nitrates and phosphates discharge that leads to disturbances of the ecosystem such as a shift in the natural species composition or oxygen deficiency near the bottom). We observe that its diet is not only composed mainly of pelagic algae of all size and forms, but also of benthic ones, and detritic and bacterial material. A number of experiments to measure and model trophic fluxes for oyster-farm ponds and shellfish bed management are being conducted in France (Blanchard, M., pers. comm., 2005).

    MarLIN (2003) states that, "for optimum growth and reproduction, an individual C. fornicata being fed with the alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum requires 5 x 108 algal cells per gram of flesh wet weight per day."

    Reproduction
    Crepidula fornicata that is typically found in stacks in which younger males are attached to the shells of larger females, exhibit a peculiar mating system as it is a long - lived protandrous hermaphrodite . This means that the animals start their lives as males and then subsequently may change sex and develop into females. Copulation is internal and larvae are grouped into an egg capsule before their release. Stacks can be viewed as independent mating group with copulation occuring between individuals occupying any position in a chain. Most females spawn twice in a year, apparently after neap tides. The variation of fecondity is very important with concentration between 5000 and 30000 eggs per female depending on the site. Laboratory experiments have revealed that following incubation, approximately 4000 larvae were released per female (MarLIN 2003).
    Lifecycle stages
    Crepidula fornicata spats settle in isolation or on top of an established chain. If the individual settles alone, it becomes male briefly, passing rapidly on to a female, especially if another animal settles on it to initiate chain formation. Sex change can only occur to the bottom-most male in a stack and takes approximately 60 days, during which the penis regresses and the pouches and glands of the female duct develop. If a juvenile settles on an established stack it develops and may remain as a male for an extended period (up to 6 years), apparently maintained by pheromones released by females lower in the stack (Fretter & Graham, 1981 in MarLIN, 2003)." C. fornicata has an obligate planktonic larval stage (Pechenik et al. 2002) that may facilitate natural dispersal. After swimming and feeding in the plankton for at least several weeks (2 to 4), the veliger larvae become competent to metamorphose (Pechenik, 1990, in Pechenik et al. 2002); that is, they become capable of metamorphosing in response to specific external cues such as adult pheromone and microbial films (Pechenik, 1980; Pechenik and Heyman, 1987; McGee and Targett, 1989; Pechenik and Gee, 1993, in Pechenik et al. 2002). In laboratory experiments the authors concluded that, ""In the absence of such external cues, the larval form can be maintained for at least an additional 10 days (Pechenik and Lima, 1984; Zimmerman and Pechenik, 1991, in Pechenik et al. 2002). Eventually the larvae metamorphose "spontaneously" in frequently cleaned glassware, in the apparent absence of external cues (Pechenik, 1984; Pechenik and Lima, 1984; Pechenik et al. 1996a, in Pechenik et al. 2002).Collin (2001) states that, "C. fornicata can usually be found attached to rocks or oyster shells, which do not facilitate adult dispersal". However, these species are also known to occur on the carapaces of horseshoe crabs (Botton & Ropes 1988), which could result in occasional long distance dispersal. Dispersal may also be facilitated by human activities such as fouling on the hull of ships,within ballast water (JNCC, 2002) and by accidental transfer linked to aquaculture (Blanchard, 1997).
    Reviewed by: Frederique Viard and Lise Dupont "Evolution et Genetique des Populations Marines" Station Biologique de Roscoff France
    Michel Blanchard IFREMER France.
    Principal sources: MarLIN, 2003., Crepidula fornicata
    de Montaudouin et al. 1999., Does the slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata, L.) impair oyster growth and zoobenthos biodiversity? A revisited hypothesis.
    Blanchard, 1997., Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in Europe. Current state and consequences
    Collin, 1995., Sex, size, and position: a test of models predicting size at sex change in the protandrous gastropod Crepidula fornicata
    Pechenik et al. 2002., Relationships between larval nutritional experience, larval growth rates, juvenile growth rates, and juvenile feeding rates in the prosobranch gastropod Crepidula fornicata
    Compiled by: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
    Last Modified: Tuesday, 7 June 2005


ISSG Landcare Research NBII IUCN University of Auckland