Taxonomic name: Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss
Synonyms: Elodea crispa
Common names: African elodea, curly waterweed, elodée africaine (French), Lagarosiphon, lagarosiphon majeur (French), oxygen weed, South African oxygen weed, submerged onocotyledon
Organism type: aquatic plant
Lagarosiphon major is a rhizomatous, perennial, submerged aquatic plant. It can inhabit freshwater lakes, dams and slow-moving streams. Lagarosiphon major can form dense floating mats in deep-water reservoirs and other water bodies and it can block the intakes of hydro-electric systems. Dense growth of Lagarosiphon major can block light penetration into waterways, eliminating growth of native water plants and affecting associated populations of aquatic invertebrates. Lagarosiphon major can also restrict the passage of boats and limit recreational activities like swimming and angling. Storms can tear weed mats loose and deposit large masses of rotting vegetation on beaches, spoiling their amenity value.
L. major is a rhizomatous, perennial, submerged aquatic plant. The National Heritage Trust (2003) state that, "L. major reaches its maximum growth in clear water up to a depth of 6.5m, but may only grow to 1 metre in murky water. It has numerous threadlike roots, which are 'adventitious' (branching from the stem) and, along with rhizomes (horizontal stems in the sediment), anchor it to the bottom. Stems, which can reach the surface, are brittle and sparsely branched, 3-5mm in diameter and curved towards the base (J-shaped). The leaves are 5-20mm long and 2-3mm wide, and occur in alternate spirals along the stem. They generally have tapered tips curving downwards towards the stem, except in low alkalinity water where they are straight. The three-petalled female flowers are very small, clear-white on the surface, and grow on very thin white to almost translucent filament-like stalks. Neither the male flower, which floats freely to the surface, nor fruit or seeds have been recorded in Australia or outside of its native range."
Egeria densa, Elodea canadensis, Hydrilla verticillata
lakes, riparian zones, water courses, wetlands
The National Heritage Trust (2003) states that, "L. major grows best in clear, still or slow-moving fresh water with silty or sandy bottoms. It prefers the cooler waters of the temperate zone, with optimum temperatures of 20-23°C and a maximum temperature of around 25°C. It can live in high and low nutrient levels and grows best under conditions of high light intensity. It also tolerates relatively high pH (ie alkaline conditions). Growth of L. major is greatest in sheltered areas protected from wind, waves and currents." Csurhes and Edwards (1998) state that, "L. major inhabits freshwater lakes, dams and slow-moving streams."
In New Zealand, the plant has blocked intakes of hydro-electric systems and has formed dense floating mats in deep-water reservoirs and other water bodies. L. major has the potential to become a troublesome weed of lakes and slow-moving streams throughout temperate and sub- tropical regions of Australia. Under favourable conditions, dense growth of the plant can block light penetration into waterways, eliminating growth of native water plants and affecting associated populations of aquatic invertebrates and vertebrates. Once widespread, control would be extremely difficult (as is the case for most submerged aquatics) (Csurhes and Edwards, 1998).
James et al. (1999) state that, "L. major creates progressively stressful conditions of high pH and low CO2 content. L. major may be successful in out-competing Elodea spp. as a result of its ability to photosynthesize and consequently grow, particularly under very stressful conditions of high pH and low free CO2, perhaps through more efficient bicarbonate utilization than the other species. There is some indication that the competitive success of L. major may be a consequence of greater toleration to pH stress.
McGregor and Gourlay (2002) state that, "L. major replaces native vegetation; dense infestations restrict the passage of boats and limit recreational activities like swimming and angling; storms can tear loose the weed and deposit large masses of rotting vegetation on beaches, spoiling their amenity value.
Rattray (1994) states that, "L. major has successfully out-competed native species wherever it has colonized." James et al. (1999) report that, "L. major has been reported to be actively displacing E. nuttallii and appears to be competitively superior to Elodea spp. in at least some habitats."
Davies et al. (2003) demonstrated that, "L. major and other aquatic species grown in small outdoor tanks can be used successfully to assess the effects of crop-protection products on non-target aquatic flora."McGregor and Gourlay (2002) state that, "L. major has some beneficial attributes. In some freshwaters, this species and some other exotic species are the only aquatic plants that can tolerate particular conditions, and removal of these plants can further degrade the habitats. It also provides habitat for aquatic fauna, and its leaf surfaces support periphyton. Where stands of the plant grow, sedimentation is increased and while this may be detrimental in some areas, elsewhere it is a benefit."
Chapman and Coffey (1971) reviewed the possible utilization by harvesting for stock food in New Zealand lakes. Though harvesting was considered practicable the use of the plants as fodder was thought to be unsuitable because of the content of arsenic accumulated by the plants from the thermal waters that enter the lakes. Arsenic in amounts of 35–75 ppm dry weight are common, and extreme values up to 2 000 ppm have been recorded. It is possible in other countries that the use of plants as fodder could be practical.
The National Heritage Trust (2003) states that, "A native of southern Africa, L. major is found in high mountain streams and ponds. It has spread throughout the world as an aquarium plant and is also known as an 'oxygen plant'. Note, however, that dense infestations can actually consume more oxygen than they produce, and reduce water quality and available oxygen."
Native range: Southern Africa (Cook 2004) (James et al. 1999).
Known introduced range: Australasia-Pacific, and Europe (McGregor and Gourlay, 2002). In Europe the species is currently know from, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom including Ireland, Scotland and England.
Introduction pathways to new locations
Pet/aquarium trade: The National Heritage Trust (2003) states that, "It has spread throughout the world as an aquarium plant."
Local dispersal methods
Boat: L. major was probably introduced to the lake in the late 1950s by inter-lake boat transfer from Lake Rotorua where at that time it formed extensive surface growths (Wells & Clayton 1991) (Wells et al. 1997).
Other (local): L. major does not produce seeds in New Zealand, but the plant is likely to spread through vegetative fragmentation from boating, fishing, weed harvesters and float planes, and possibly some species of bird (McGregor and Gourlay, 2002).
McGregor and Gourlay (2002) report that, "The main, current control methods for this species include the application of herbicide (usually Diquat), mechanical and suction dredging and weed matting, but all these have substantial disadvantages; particularly their cost, their failure to give long-term control and, for some, the question of adverse environmental effects, whether actual or perceived."
Chemical: Hofstra and Clayton (2001) report that, "The aquatic herbicide diquat is the only product registered in New Zealand for controlling the submerged weeds, including lagarosiphon (L. major." The authors claim that, "However, diquat can be ineffective under some environmental conditions and it does not control certain submerged weeds." The authors studied three other herbicides (endothall, triclopyr, and dichlobenil), and found that, "Endothall killed coontail, lagarosiphon and hydrilla and some species of Myriophyllum and Potamogeton but not egeria or species of Chara or Nitella. Only transient growth effects were observed in target plants treated with triclopyr and dichlobenil."
Davies et al. (2003) investigated the use of Sulfosulfuron, which is a selective, post-emergence, sulfonylurea herbicide intended for use in winter wheat. The authors found though that, "Treatment with sulfosulfuron at any concentration stimulated biomass accumulation." This product should not be used as a treatment method.
Biological: Lake et al. (2002) state that, "Selective feeding by rudd may also be significant in lakes that have been invaded by exotic oxygen weeds in New Zealand (e.g. Egeria densa, Elodea canadensis, and Lagarosiphon major) by facilitating their monospecific habit through suppression or exclusion of more desirable species."
McGregor and Gourlay (2002) report that, "The nematode Aphelenchoides fragariae has been recorded attacking the apical tips of L. major causing shoot dwarfing. Nymphula nitens feeds on many aquatic weeds and might be a potential biological control agent, but it also feeds upon native aquatics. Biological control offers the prospect of re-establishing native macrophyte communities in infected waters, however biological control and the removal of L. major may only result in the replacements of one exotic species for another."Chapman and Coffey (1971) review the introduction and spread of L. major in New Zealand. The possibility of the use of grass carp was investigated for control so a few fish were imported from Malaysia.Trials showed that carp would eat the problem weeds.
Rattray (1994) found that early shoot growth by L. major is more rapid under oligotrophic and eutrophic conditions.(A eutrophic lake or river is characterised by high productivity and biomass. It is rich in dissolved nutrients, often shallow and seasonally deficient in oxygen. This fertilization can be a natural process or one brought on by human activity, the latter often having a negative impact on the ecosystem. A water body is termed mesotrophic if its production is considered moderate. The term oligotrophic describes a lake or river with low productivity, deficient in plant nutrients, rich in oxygen throughout its depth and with good water clarity).
Reviewed by: Robin W. Scribailo Ph.D. Aquatic Botanist Professor of Biological Sciences Director of the Biological Sciences Field Station
Director of the Aquatic Plant Herbarium Biological Sciences, Purdue University North Central. USA
Principal sources: McGregor and Gourlay, 2002 Assessing the prospects for biological control of lagarosiphon (Lagarosiphon major (Hydrocharitaceae))
National Heritage Trust, 2003 Lagarosiphon (Lagarosiphon major)
Compiled by: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) with support from the Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity Information System (TFBIS) Programme (Copyright statement)
Last Modified: Tuesday, 11 April 2006